Klyxx
AI-powered UX/UI audits

Catch UX problems
before your users do.

Upload a screen. Klyxx analyzes usability, visual hierarchy, accessibility, and friction points — then gives you prioritized fixes and an AI-ready prompt to improve it.

Launching June 2026View Sample Report

Launching June 2026 · Join the list for early access.

app.klyx.co/audit/dashboard-001
Uploaded Screen
Weak CTA hierarchy
Low contrast text
Competing actions
Screen typeDashboard Screen
PlatformWeb App
GoalImprove onboarding clarity
UX Audit Score
82/ 100
Strong foundation
A few high-impact fixes will sharpen this screen significantly.
Clarity
85
Visual Hierarchy
80
CTA Strength
78
Typography
84
Accessibility
70
Quick Wins
1
Make primary CTA more prominentHigh impact
2
Reduce competing actions above the fold
3
Improve contrast on muted text
4
Simplify top navigation grouping
AI-Ready Fix Prompt
Redesign this dashboard to improve clarity and hierarchy. Make the primary CTA more visually prominent, reduce competing actions, improve text contrast, and simplify the top navigation while maintaining the same modern visual style.
Optimized for AI builders
Paste into
CursorLovableBoltv0BananiClaudeChatGPT

Built for the new generation of app builders.

Indie HackersFoundersDevelopersNo-Code BuildersAI App BuildersAgencies
How it works

From screenshot to fix plan.

Klyxx turns a static screen into prioritized UX feedback and a prompt you can actually use.

01

Upload a screen

Drop in a screenshot from your app, dashboard, onboarding flow, landing page, or mobile UI.

02

Tell Klyxx the goal

Add the screen type, platform, and what the user is supposed to do so the audit has real context.

03

Get a clear fix plan

Receive a scored UX audit, prioritized improvements, and an AI-ready prompt to improve the screen.

Why Klyxx

Structured UX feedback you can actually use.

Generic AI feedback gives you observations. Klyxx gives you priorities, scoring, and a fix plan you can build from.

Generic AI Feedback

No UX structure or framework
No scoring consistency
No screen context awareness
Generic, surface-level recommendations
No workflow or builder awareness

Klyxx Audit

Built for builders
Context-aware audits per screen type
Structured UX scoring across 5 dimensions
Prioritized fix plans, not just observations
Builder-ready prompts for AI tools
Platform-specific and goal-driven feedback
Features

Everything your screen needs to improve.

Klyxx turns UX feedback into scores, priorities, and builder-ready prompts you can act on immediately.

UX scoring

See how your screen performs across clarity, hierarchy, accessibility, CTA strength, and polish.

Visual hierarchy review

Understand what users notice first, what gets buried, and where attention should be redirected.

CTA clarity

Check whether the main action is obvious enough and whether competing elements are stealing attention.

Typography & spacing

Spot readability, sizing, rhythm, and layout issues before they make the interface feel rough.

Prioritized fixes

Get clear recommendations ranked by impact so you know what to improve first.

AI-ready fix prompt

Copy a clean prompt into Cursor, Lovable, Bolt, v0, Banani, Claude, or ChatGPT.

Sample Report

What a real Klyxx audit delivers.

Every audit includes a first impression read, prioritized findings, predicted user behavior, and paste-ready fix prompts for every tool you use — generated from your actual screen, not a template.

Dashboard Screen
Web AppOnboarding Clarity
Klyxx Intelligence
Audit #001
System Detections
CTA Competition Detected
Visual Weight Imbalance
Navigation Saturation
Weak Primary Focus Anchor
Accessibility Risk Present
82/100
Composite UX HealthStrong Foundation
0Critical
2High
2Medium
3Quick Wins
Cognitive Delay
4.2s
Until primary workflow is clear
Friction Index
Medium–High
Interaction Confidence
62%
Implementation Confidence
7/10
What this means

Users arriving at this dashboard may feel visually overloaded before identifying what to do first. The interface currently lacks one clear focal point — attention splits between competing actions, equal-weight cards, and a dense navigation that offers no directional signal.

The strongest improvements are establishing a single dominant CTA and reducing the number of above-fold interaction zones. Most of the fixes are CSS or design-token level — not full rebuilds.

Priority improvements
Establish a single dominant CTA
Reduce above-fold interaction zones
Fix sidebar contrast (WCAG AA)
Consolidate navigation to 4 items
Expected outcome
Reduced first-session hesitation, clearer onboarding path, stronger CTA conversion.
First Impression
First 5 seconds

A first-time user lands on a clean, well-organized SaaS interface with clear navigation and a recognizable dashboard layout. The structure communicates “product dashboard” immediately. However, without a dominant focal point or clear primary action above the fold, the eye scans competing elements equally — creating hesitation before the first meaningful interaction.

Biggest Problem

Three CTAs compete at equal visual weight above the fold, eliminating a clear primary path and increasing decision latency.

Biggest Strength

Clean layout structure, consistent card grid, and restrained color palette provide a strong foundation to build hierarchy on.

Quick Wins — Fix These First
High impact · Low effort
1

Three CTAs compete at equal visual weight

Promote the most valuable action to a filled, high-contrast brand-colored primary button. Demote remaining actions to secondary styling so there is a clear visual order of operations.

2

Sidebar text fails WCAG AA contrast

Darken muted gray text to meet at least 4.5:1 against its background. Apply globally via design token — do not patch inline.

Annotated Screen
Attention zone
1
2
3
4
High impact
Medium impact
Dimension Scores
Visual Hierarchy68
CTA Prominence60
Interaction Flow70
Cognitive Load72
Accessibility Contrast52
Spacing Consistency76
Readability74
Layout Balance62
Conversion Friction70
Onboarding Clarity48
Trust Signals62
Navigation Structure80
Mobile Responsiveness50
Information Density58
UI Consistency78
Attention Flow60
Weakest dimensionOnboarding Clarity · 48
Verdict

Strong foundation. Fixable issues concentrated in CTA clarity and hierarchy. High implementation readiness.

Priority Issues
1
Three CTAs compete at equal visual weight

"Upgrade", "Invite Team", and "Create Project" share identical visual treatment above the fold. Without dominant hierarchy, users have no clear primary path — measurably increasing decision latency and early exit risk.

Too many equally-weighted buttons make it unclear what to do first.

Business impact: Reduces onboarding momentum · Elevates first-session abandonment
HighCTAQuick WinHick's LawCSS-onlyHigh impact94% conf.
Copy fix prompt for
2
Seven interaction zones carry equal weight

No dominant focal point in the main content area. Equal-weight cards eliminate natural reading anchors — increasing time-to-action and raising scan interruption likelihood.

With everything equally prominent, users don't know where attention should land.

Business impact: Weakens feature discoverability · Increases time-to-first-action
HighAttention FlowStructuralVisual HierarchyModerate refactorConversion risk88% conf.
Copy fix prompt for
3
Sidebar text fails WCAG AA contrast

Secondary sidebar labels measure at 3.1:1 contrast ratio — below the 4.5:1 WCAG AA minimum. Creates readability friction across display types and variable lighting conditions.

The sidebar text is too faint to read comfortably on most screens.

Business impact: Compliance risk · Affects ~15–20% of users in suboptimal conditions
MediumAccessibilityQuick WinWCAG 2.1 AADesign tokenLow effort99% conf.
Copy fix prompt for
4
Nine nav items without visual grouping

Top navigation exposes nine items at equal weight with no priority signaling. This pattern consistently correlates with elevated navigation confusion and reduced conversion on primary actions.

Too many menu items at equal weight slow users down and fragment attention.

Business impact: Elevates cognitive load · Reduces primary CTA conversion rate
MediumNavigationStructuralMiller's LawStructural issueNavigation fix81% conf.
Copy fix prompt for
Predicted User Behavior

Users are likely scanning analytics cards before discovering the intended onboarding action — the primary CTA has no dominant visual anchor.

92%

Equal-weight CTAs may increase hesitation during first-session interaction. Decision latency likely peaks before any primary action is initiated.

87%

Navigation density may interrupt directional scanning and reduce task confidence across first and second sessions.

79%
Interaction Confidence
Equal-weight actions reduce user confidence at the primary decision point.
62%
Below target
AI Fix Prompt
klyx-prompt.txt
Generated from audit
// KLYX GENERATED IMPLEMENTATION PROMPT
screen=dashboard | platform=web_app | goal=onboarding_clarity
ux_score=82 | issues_found=4 | cognitive_delay=4.2s | confidence=0.88
[CTA_COMPETITION]HIGHconfidence=0.94
Establish one dominant CTA. Remove 'Upgrade' and 'Invite Team' from the primary zone. Increase 'Create Project' size ~20% with full brand color and 12px additional horizontal padding. Move secondary actions to an overflow menu.
principle=hicks_law | effort=LOW | impact=HIGH | type=css_spacing
[HIERARCHY_COLLAPSE]HIGHconfidence=0.88
Reduce above-fold interaction zones from 7 to 3. Introduce one visually dominant hero element. Group secondary cards below a clear hierarchy break with reduced visual weight.
principle=visual_hierarchy | effort=MEDIUM | impact=HIGH | type=layout_refactor
[CONTRAST_FAILURE]MEDIUMconfidence=0.99
Update sidebar text tokens from #9CA3AF → #4B5563 (achieves 4.5:1 WCAG AA ratio). Apply globally via design token — do not patch inline.
standard=WCAG_AA | effort=LOW | impact=MEDIUM | type=design_token
[NAV_SATURATION]MEDIUMconfidence=0.81
Consolidate 9 nav items → 4 primary + 'More' overflow. Group related sections, remove redundant top-level links. Keep working memory load under 5 items.
principle=millers_law | effort=MEDIUM | impact=MEDIUM | type=ia_restructure
// VISUAL SYSTEM
// Color system is internally consistent. Contrast hierarchy needs correction (signal #3).
// Increase font-weight on primary labels. No accent color conflicts detected.
// PRESERVE
// Existing color palette, card grid layout, and overall modern aesthetic.
Contextually generated · Not templated
Dimension Score Breakdown
Calibrated 0–100
Visual Hierarchy
68
CTA Prominence
60
Interaction Flow
70
Cognitive Load
72
Accessibility Contrast
52
Spacing Consistency
76
Readability
74
Layout Balance
62
Conversion Friction
70
Onboarding Clarity
48
Trust Signals
62
Navigation Structure
80
Mobile Responsiveness
50
Information Density
58
UI Consistency
78
Attention Flow
60
Weakest dimensionOnboarding Clarity · 48
At a Glance
Based on audit findings
Top Issues
HIGHThree CTAs compete at equal visual weight — no dominant primary action above the fold.
MEDSidebar text fails WCAG AA contrast — affects readability across display conditions.
Worth Preserving
Clean layout structure and consistent card grid — strong visual foundation.
Restrained color palette with clear semantic intent — do not dilute the accent.
Navigation structure is logically grouped — reduce count, preserve the grouping.
Generated by Klyxx AI Analysis Engine · schema v1.0 · Contextual, not templated
Pricing

Simple, flexible pricing.

Start with a $5 audit, then choose a monthly plan when you’re ready. Every plan includes scored UX reports, prioritized findings, and AI-ready fix prompts.

Try it first
$5one-time

1 audit included

Run one audit before choosing a plan. See the exact findings, scores, and fix prompts Klyxx gives you.

Full scored UX report
AI-ready fix prompts
All 16 UX dimensions
Starter
$12/mo

10 audits/month

For solo builders and occasional UX checks.

10 audits/month
Full scored UX reports
AI-ready fix prompts
Saved audit history
Most popular
Pro
$29/mo

40 audits/month

For active builders improving apps and flows every month.

40 audits/month
Full scored UX reports
AI-ready fix prompts
Saved audit history
Priority support
Studio
$59/mo

120 audits/month

For agencies, product teams, and heavy users.

120 audits/month
Full scored UX reports
AI-ready fix prompts
Saved audit history
Team sharing coming soon

Subscriptions and checkout become available June 2026.

Credits reset monthly based on your plan. Need more audits? Upgrade anytime.

Before you ship,
know what to fix.

Klyxx helps modern app builders create cleaner, clearer, more launch-ready interfaces — with structured audits and AI-ready fix prompts.

Launching June 2026View Sample Report

Launching June 2026 · Join the list for early access.